Thursday, September 25, 2014

Local, Sustainable, Secure: Food Justice in the U.S.


The 21st century U.S. food production systems are harming us, its citizens, more than helping us. In the past five years, the terms “locally grown” and “organic” have become buzzwords for those trying to eat in a healthier and more environmentally friendly way. But what does “locally grown” really mean? Are we all expected to become backyard farmers? It is often debated whether the economic and ecological costs of buying locally produced food really outweigh those of buying from traditional supermarkets. What is the true price of these massive corporate food production methods on our cultures, our wildlife, and our communities? Philip Ackerman-Leist, author and Green Mountain College professor, suggests we go back to basics and rebuild our eating habits, and our communities, quite literally from the ground up.

               In his new book, Rebuilding the Foodshed, one of the first issues Ackerman-Leist raises is how “local” local really is. Is it just about geography? Before you answer that, consider this: where do you consider “home”? Why? Is it just because that is where your house is? Probably not. We humans tend to feel at home in places where we have made connections; and Ackerman-Leist is all about connections. When we feel a physical, emotional attachment to a town, state, or region, we like to take ownership of it. This is where local food appeals to us. Vermont FEED, one of the first farm-to-school systems and food education programs, focuses on bringing the food conversation to "the three C's: cafeteria, classroom, and community." The program reminds Vermonters that there are many benefits to supporting local agriculture; economically, environmentally, and nutritionally. As many of us know very well, education is the first step to change.

It’s not just about facts and figures, miles and minutes of travel, gas consumption and greenhouse gasses. It is much more personal than that: the feeling of biting into a fresh, crisp apple may take you back to apple-picking with your family when you were 10. Or the smell of melting mozzarella makes you yearn for your mother’s lasagna. It is a deep cultural and familial connection to what we eat, how we eat and prepare it, and how we feel while doing it. Think of Italy, for example. What is the first image that pops into your mind? For me, it is fresh garlic, tomato sauce, and warm home cooking. It is the feeling that I am missing out on something essential if I do not visit the country, and try these things while I am there. Or, to bring it closer to home, think of the Deep South. Louisiana gumbo, hand-battered fried chicken, home-grown strawberry jams; all are an indispensable part of the local culture. Even Vermont has maple syrup...and maple candies, maple lemonade, maple cotton candy...you get the point. As Ackerman-Leist says, it's idea that “we can never truly experience a place until we taste a particular fruit, a time-honored dish, a unique spirit, any of which may be replicated elsewhere but diminishes in authenticity with every mile it travels.”

                The current mentality of the United States is that “food can be grown elsewhere.” But why does it have to be? We have some of the most fertile, arable land here in the U.S., but it is being targeted for urban development. Instead of using these vast expanses of beautiful land to help sustain us, we are building more property that we don’t need, killing wildlife and ecosystems, and utterly destroying the landscape. Urban development also has its own issues. Have you ever heard of a food desert? Neither had I until about this time last year. A food desert describes an urban or suburban area that has no access to grocery stores, and instead must rely on convenience marts and beverage shops for food. Not very healthy, is it? Nor it is affordable: these neighborhoods are mostly populated by “racially diverse workers so critical to our food production system,” and yet they are living off wages that do not even allow them to adequately feed their own families. Take, for example, Birmingham, Alabama. Yes, a bustling city smack in the middle of one of the most food-centric cultures in the United States has areas where access to fresh, nutritious food is nearly impossible. To combat this, a woman named Taylor Clark began the Urban Food Project to support local food production. It is difficult to introduce any kind of urban farming in Birmingham, as there is a cultural bias toward unhealthier food, such as the fried chicken I mentioned earlier. Additionally, it is an area where poverty is prevalent, and many cannot afford to buy local produce, or sometimes any produce at all. But bringing healthy, sustainably-raised food to markets like these, Clark admits, can be slow. Theresa Snow, a graduate of Sterling College, has taken steps to increase food security in Vermont as well. In 2005, she co-founded Salvation Farms, a nonprofit that would absorb and redistribute surplus fruits and vegetables throughout northern Vermont. She works very closely with the Vermont Food Bank to increase food security and create community-based solutions to aid food accessibility.

Courtesy of installitdirect.com
                But what about distance? What is the effect of actual miles traveled over physical land, via tractor trailer, plane, ship, or a local farmer’s pickup? The food we eat requires energy: electricity and fertilizer to grow, to harvest, to package, to ship, to prepare, to cook, to dispose of. That’s a lot of energy. Ackerman-Leist explains it this way: say each food serving gives us one calorie. It takes between seven and ten “calories” to produce that one serving. That a little but outrageous, no? That it takes seven to ten times more energy to produce a food serving than said food serving actually gives us. So how do we combat this obscene energy imbalance? Ackerman-Leist gives a few options, and describes what the most effective food production companies do. The biggest food suppliers use hybrid and fuel-efficient vehicles, computerized pickup and delivery systems that monitor supply and demand, supply food regionally rather than strictly locally, use local aggregates like Co-ops (or “food hubs”), and some workplaces even sponsor “community-supported agriculture” programs where food is regularly delivered to one work building for the benefit of many people. But what about waste? As much as we would like to believe otherwise, most of us buy too much food, or don’t eat our leftovers before they go bad. As Ackerman-Leist says, “it may not be the sexiest consideration, but it’s the most important.” After all, food wasted is energy wasted. In my hometown of West Boylston, MA, a composting initiative was started about five years ago. Like other towns nationwide, we had to buy special, more costly trash bags that would be picked up by our waste management trucks. This was supposed to encourage more recycling and composting and less willy-nilly tossing of reusable products. Vermont also has a similar "soil-to-soil" program to build a statewide food system over the next decade (from 2013-2023). It is the hope of environmentalists that programs like these will not only reduce energy consumption, but also packaging and waste products.

Courtesy of eatcology.com
                Of course, these are just a few ways in which we can all pitch in to rebuild our nation’s food production systems. The less we rely on CAFOs (confined animal feeding operations) and pesticide-pitching “factory farms,” the more we help our environment and our fellow Americans. Local and regional food systems don’t just encourage healthy lifestyles and a sense of community, but also food justice. There would be no workers doing dangerous jobs (like slaughtering animals on an assembly line) for wages that do not even cover the cost of their own dinner. It may be idealistic, but imagine if we all had a handful of local farmers and cooperatives that allowed us access to nutritious, affordable, delicious fresh food. We would have a sense of community with our neighbors, and feel more attached to where we live. It’s not just about the environment, fossil fuels, or our next meal. Local and sustainable food systems are about us, our impact, and our future.



Also featured on Amazon.

Friday, September 19, 2014

Nature's War on People

Courtesy of Parsnippety.com
As I mindlessly scrolled through my Facebook feed a few days ago, a small notification popped up at the corner of my screen. One of my friends had shared a link on my wall. Not unusual for my group of friends, who all know how passionate I am about various social issues. But this article was different. It contained no cute pictures of animals, no GIFs of sassy women, no new political outcries.

It was an article from Parsnippety, titled Plants and Animals Vote Against War on People, Opting to Wait Them Out. If that doesn't catch your attention, what will?

I know it does not directly relate to the sustainable food systems of Vermont and the U.S., but climate change and the environmental movement are all about intersection. What is more relevant to food than the animals people tend to eat?

The short article by William Azalea is very cute in its presentation. It features "quotes" from "BioCongress" leader Elizabeth Steelhead Trout. Azalea imagines a meeting of local wildlife to vote on what actions to take against humans, who have launched a "comprehensive assault on them" throughout the past few centuries. The article subtly indicated the number of endangered species we currently know of: 217.
There are two hundred seventeen endangered species of animals and plants on planet Earth that we know of. As far as humans know, there could be hundreds or thousands more that are extinct or near extinct, and we just have not found them yet. It actually took me several read-throughs of this article before I realized the significance of this number, posed as a voting result.

Steelhead Trout points out that humans have destroyed so much natural habitat for these species that many have either gone extinct, or have been forced to live "in the foul, polluted conditions that their greedy habits and unthinking excesses have created." Ouch. Yet despite this act of war we have imposed on all wildlife, they have not declared war back. It can be argued that this is because animals and plants are not sentient beings that are capable of collectively taking up arms against the human race. I would attest to that. But are they not fighting back in their own way?

Courtesy of Pinterest.com
When we abandon buildings such as the Minnesota farmhouse above, do plants not slowly overcome them? Does the Earth not take back its own? Small animals make homes and build families in these old, forgotten places. Tiny and frail blades of grass can push their way through black concrete. Nature takes back what humans stole from her.

Animals that have been restricted in their living and hunting grounds must find refuge someplace else. How many bear sightings have you seen in your area? Wolf sightings? Fox? How many livestock/pets/properties destroyed at the paws of these poor creatures who have literally nowhere else to go? Yet most humans fail to acknowledge this tragedy and continue killing these "ruthless predators" because they are "scary" or "dangerous." What many fail to realize is that this is our fault. Mice and rats infest our homes because we built them on the fields the poor rodents once lived in. Squirrels eat from our bird-feeders because we cut down their trees to build houses and fuel fires. Animals don't owe us anything. We owe them.

We owe them apologies, homes, food. We have pushed them to the brink of extinction and refuse to help pull them back.

Courtesy of Rob McKay Photography
So no, maybe this article does not directly relate to agricultural systems or sustainability. But if we continue clear-cutting forests for farmland and building empty houses, these animals will be further marginalized and eventually killed. Then what will the next generation do? There will be no birds singing, no fish for fishing (if that's what you're into), and no beautiful, untouched stretches of nature to inspire books like Walden, or poems like those from Alice Walker.

Take a moment to read this short piece. It's funny, it's cute, and it will help you appreciate that we still have Steelhead Trout to give us words of wisdom.

Wednesday, September 17, 2014

Welcome to Sustainable Security!


www.permaculturecottage.wordpress.com
Hey there everyone! If you're here, odds are that you are at least a little interested in sustainable food systems, permaculture, and other environmental issues. If so, you are in the perfect place.


I'm new to "professional," journalistic blogging, so it might take me a post or two to get the hang of things. I am dedicated to providing you, my audience, with the newest and most relevant facts and stories about sustainable agriculture, the local food movement, and how each and every human on planet Earth is affected by food justice.


As for me, my name is Alanna. I am a college student in Vermont, USA. Stay tuned for news, book reviews, and some really cool websites.


Sources:

I will be pulling information from various digital and analog sources throughout my time here at Sustainable Security. Here are just a few to get us started....

primalgirl.com
"Dynamic" Sources:
(Continuous, content-tracking, collaborative)






6. Grist  



9. The Green Room (environmental podcasts)

10. LiveGreenBeGreen


"Static" Sources:
(Stand-alone news articles, videos, podcasts)

1. Rebuilding the Foodshed, book by Philip Ackerman-Leist


Organic garden at Saint Michael's College





1. Theresa Snow, Salvation Farms
802-522-3148
info@salvationfarms.org

2. Tim Laird, Intervale Community Farm
802-658-2919
intervalecommunityfarm@juno.com

3. Deb Krempecke, Lamoille Community Food Share
802-888-6550
lcfoodshare@gmail.com

4. Abbie Nelson, Shelburne Farms
802-985-8686
abbienelson@aol.com
 
5. Linda Berlin, UVM Cooperative Extension
(Food Access)
802-656-0669

6. Heather Ellis-Lynch, Director of Saint Michael's College Office of Sustainability
802.654.2733
hellis@smcvt.edu

7. Kirby Peters, Intern at SMC Office of Sustainability
(Local Food Initiative)
kpeters@mail.smcvt.edu

8. Michael Bosia, Professor of Sustainable Food Systems and
Political Science at Saint Michael's College
mbosia@smcvt.edu

9. Paul Comey, VP of Environmental Affairs at
Green Mountain Coffee Roasters
LinkedIn Profile

10. Jeffrey Ayres, Professor of Political Science at Saint Michael's College, Author of  
Globalization and Food Sovereignty: Global and Local Change in the New Politics of Food

jayres@smcvt.edu



Questions:



·         How did you get involved in the local, sustainable farming movement?
o   How long have you been a part of it?
·         What does the local food movement mean to you?
o   Why is it so important?
o   Was there anyone who told you, “you can’t?”
§  Did they mean legally, agriculturally, or socially acceptably?
·         When does the cost of buying traditionally-grown food outweigh the benefits of buying locally?
o   How local is local?
·         How do you manage resources?
o   Water? Finances? Employees?
o   (Gleaning)
·         What has been your greatest challenge?
·         How would you encourage the “average Vermonter” to get involved?
o   Education/buying/growing?

Other:
Sites and other sources


6. Green Up! (Saint Michael's College environmental club)


Google Alert Tracking:

1. Permaculture

2. Local Food

3.   Vermont

4. Sustainability

5. Food Justice

6. Agribusiness

7. Monoculture

8. Organic Farming

9. Hedge Funds